Print

TEACHER IMPACT EVALUATION

Instructional Resources Scoring Rubric

Unsatisfactory
(1 point)

Needs Improvement/Developing
(2 points)

Effective
(4 points)

Highly Effective
(6 points)

  • No objectives provided.
  • Objectives provided, but no explanation given as to why they were selected, or
  • It is unclear whether these objectives are appropriately aligned with course standards and learning goals.
  • 1 objective provided and explanation given as to why it was selected.
  • Objectives selected mostly demonstrate appropriate consideration of course objectives and student learning goals.
  • 2 or more /objectives selected and explanation given as to why they were selected.
  • Objectives selected demonstrate appropriate consideration of course objectives and student learning goals.

Unsatisfactory
(1 point)

Needs Improvement/Developing
(2 points)

Effective
(4 points)

Highly Effective
(6 points)

  • No explanation of student selection provided
  • Description of included students provided.
  • Description of student groups/classes included and excluded from artifact submission provided.
  • Selected students represent a select group of students taught.
  • At least 2 grade levels (>= 10 students in each class) included in your teaching schedule are adequately represented.
  • Selected students represent most students taught (at least 3 major subgroups of students taught are represented).

Unsatisfactory
(1 point)

Needs Improvement/Developing
(2 points)

Effective
(4 points)

Highly Effective
(6 points)

  • No artifacts provided
  • Pre- and post-course artifacts are provided.
  • Appropriate pre- and post-course artifacts are provided.
  • Artifacts are somewhat aligned with course objectives.
  • Artifacts somewhat demonstrate student growth from "pre" to "post"".
  • Exemplary pre- and post-course artifacts are provided & explained.
  • Artifacts clearly demonstrate student growth from earlier grade level to later grade level.
  • Artifacts are closely aligned with course objectives.

Unsatisfactory
(1 point)

Needs Improvement/Developing
(8 points)

Effective
(12 points)

Highly Effective
(15 points)

  • No explanation provided
  • Discussion of growth in skill-set of one student group is provided.
  • Student growth and/or achievement is described.
  • Discussion of growth in skill-set of one student group/class is provided.
  • Student growth and achievement is questionably shown to be the result of teacher efforts and strategies.
  • Discussion of student growth and performance is questionably aligned with course objectives.
  • Discussion of growth in skill-set of At least 2 student groups/classes is provided.
  • Significant student growth and achievement is clearly described and shown to be the result of teacher efforts and strategies.
  • Discussion of student growth and performance is clearly aligned with course objectives/standards.
  • Explanation of how teacher’s methods directly affected student growth and performance is clear.