Print

TEACHER IMPACT EVALUATION

CTE - Industry Certifications Scoring Rubric

Unsatisfactory
(1 point)

Needs Improvement/Developing
(2 points)

Effective
(4 points)

Highly Effective
(6 points)

  • No objectives provided.
  • Appropriate Goal selected,but
  • Previous year’s review of student participation/opportunities in certification or WBL was not provided; OR
  • Inappropriate Goal was selected based on prior year’s participation data.
  • Appropriate goal selected based on previous year’s participation data, BUT
  • No explanation of how the course framework standards align with the selected goal.
  • Appropriate goal selected based on previous year’s participation data.
  • Explanation of how the goal selected is aligned with course framework objectives is clear.

Unsatisfactory
(1 point)

Needs Improvement/Developing
(2 points)

Effective
(4 points)

Highly Effective
(6 points)

  • No explanation of student selection provided.
  • Description of included students provided.
  • Description of student groups/classes included and excluded from artifact submission provided.
  • Selected students represent most groups/classes taught.
  • Student groups/classes included in your teaching schedule are adequately represented.
  • Selected students represent all groups/classes taught.

Unsatisfactory
(1 point)

Needs Improvement/Developing
(2 points)

Effective
(4 points)

Highly Effective
(6 points)

  • No artifacts provided
  • Pre- and post-course artifacts are provided and described.
  • Appropriate pre- and post-course artifacts are provided that represent most student groups/classes taught.
  • Artifacts are reasonably aligned with course objectives.
  • Sound selection criteria provided.
  • Exemplary pre- and post-course artifacts are provided.
  • Artifacts clearly demonstrate student growth from beginning to end of year.
  • Artifacts are closely aligned with course objectives and standards.

Unsatisfactory
(1 point)

Needs Improvement/Developing
(8 points)

Effective
(12 points)

Highly Effective
(15 points)

  • No explanation provided.
  • Discussion of growth in skill-set of some student groups/classes is provided.
  • Student growth and achievement is minimally described and shown to be the result of teacher efforts and strategies.
  • Discussion of growth in skill-set of most student groups/classes is provided.
  • Student growth and achievement is satisfactorily described and shown to be the result of teacher efforts and strategies.
  • Discussion of student growth and performance is adequately aligned with course objectives/standards.
  • Explanation of how teacher’s methods directly affected student growth and performance is adequate.
  • Discussion of growth in skill-set of all student groups/classes is provided.
  • Significant student growth and achievement is clearly described and shown to be the result of teacher efforts and strategies.
  • Discussion of student growth and performance is clearly aligned with course objectives/standards.
  • Explanation of how teacher’s methods directly affected student growth and performance is clear and exemplary.