TEACHER IMPACT EVALUATION
CTE − Framework Scoring Rubric
Unsatisfactory
(1 point)
Needs Improvement/Developing
(2 points)
Effective
(4 points)
Highly Effective
(6 points)
No objectives provided.
- Standards/objectives provided, but no explanation given as to why they were selected, or
- It is unclear whether these objectives are appropriately aligned with course standards and learning goals.
- standards/objectives selected and explanation given as to why they were selected.
- Standards/objectives selected clearly demonstrate appropriate consideration of course objectives and student learning goals.
- standards/objectives selected and explanation given as to why they were selected.
- Standards/objectives selected clearly demonstrate appropriate consideration of course objectives and student learning goals.
Unsatisfactory
(1 point)
Needs Improvement/Developing
(2 points)
Effective
(4 points)
Highly Effective
(6 points)
No explanation of student selection provided.
Description of included students provided.
- Description of student groups/classes included and excluded from artifact submission provided.
- Selected students represent most groups/classes taught.
- All student groups/classes included in your teaching schedule are adequately represented.
- Selected students represent all groups/classes taught.
Unsatisfactory
(1 point)
Needs Improvement/Developing
(2 points)
Effective
(4 points)
Highly Effective
(6 points)
No artifacts provided.
Pre- and post-course artifacts are provided and described.
- Appropriate pre- and post-course artifacts are provided that represent most student groups/classes taught.
- Artifacts are reasonably aligned with course objectives.
- Sound selection criteria provided.
- Exemplary pre and post-course artifacts are provided.
- Artifacts clearly demonstrate student growth from the beginning to the end of year.
- Artifacts are closely aligned with course objectives and standards.
Unsatisfactory
(1 point)
Needs Improvement/Developing
(8 points)
Effective
(12 points)
Highly Effective
(15 points)
No explanation provided.
- Discussion of growth in skill-set of some student groups/classes is provided.
- Student growth and achievement is minimally described and shown to be the result of teacher efforts and strategies.
- Discussion of growth in skill-set of most student groups/classes is provided.
- Student growth and achievement is satisfactorily described and shown to be the result of teacher efforts and strategies.
- Discussion of student growth and performance is adequately aligned with course objectives/standards.
- Explanation of how teacher’s methods directly affected student growth and performance is adequate.
- Discussion of growth in skill-set of all student groups/classes is provided.
- Significant student growth and achievement is clearly described and shown to be the result of teacher efforts and strategies.
- Discussion of student growth and performance is clearly aligned with course objectives/standards.
- Explanation of how teacher’s methods directly affected student growth and performance is clear and exemplary.