School Year
 Back to School List

Data Analysis - Needs Assessment

PatternELAMathScienceSocial Studies
What trends emerge across grade levels, subgroups, and core content areas?
Decrease in ELA proficiency levels in grade 3. Decrease in Lowest 25 ELA gains
Overall, all of the math components improved compared to last year. There was a significant increase in students making gains in the Lowest 25%.
Science proficiency increased by 12%
N/A
Which data component showed the most improvement? What new actions did your school take in this area?
Students scoring proficiently in science increased by 12%. Students making gains in Lowest 25% in Math increased by 16%. We incorporated Whole Brain Teaching strategies and increased monitoring student progress using formative assessments in both Science and Math. Additionally, there was an emphasis on small group instruction in Math in order to provide additional support.
Which data component showed the lowest performance? Explain the contributing factor(s) to last year's low performance and discuss any trends.
The lowest performing component was the students scoring proficiently in grade 3. There is a large group of SWD students in this grade level, and we need to provide more targeted instruction in order to help them access grade level curriculum.
Which data component showed the greatest decline from the prior year? Explain the factor(s) that contributed to this decline.
The greatest decline was the Lowest 25% in ELA which decreased from 82% FY24 to 69% FY25 (-13). Additionally, students scoring at proficient levels in 3rd grade decreased from 56% FY24 to 40% FY25 (-16).
Which data component had the greatest gap when compared to the state average? Explain the factor(s) that contributed to this gap and any trends. State data can be found here.
The largest gaps when compared to the state were the 3rd and 4th grade proficiency levels in ELA. 3rd grade scored 17% below the state average, and 4th grade scored 6% below the state average. The biggest factor contributing to this gap include a lack of effective scaffolding in order to help students master grade level curriculum.
Rank your highest priorities (maximum of 5) for school improvement in the upcoming school year.
Increase proficiency levels in ELA in grades 3-5 Increase Reading Lowest 25% gains Increase proficiency levels in Math in grades 3-5

SIP - Areas of Focus

At Mike Davis Elementary School, students will achieve personal success in their learning and will become responsible and productive citizens.
Mike Davis Elementary School will provide a learning environment that will empower students reach their full potential, both personally and academically. This will be accomplished through the implementation of best practices and strong partnerships among parents, community members and staff members.
The overall ELA proficiency levels in grades 3-5 will improve from 53% to 57% as evidenced by the 2026 FAST Assessment.
(View Marzano Model)
Helping students examine their reasoning
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
CER's related to grade level standards will be thoughtfully planned during collaborative planning.
Person Responsible:
Reading Coach
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Lesson plans
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Teachers will implement the planned CER's to help students examine their reasoning.
Person Responsible:
Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
FTEM
Action #3
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
During Collaborative Planning, teams will analyze the impact of students examining their reasoning based on student data.
Person Responsible:
Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Reading unit assessments
Action #4
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Effective interventions will be implemented to provide further support for students, based on data discussed during MTSS meetings.
Person Responsible:
Resource Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
SSP Data
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
The overall Math proficiency levels in grades 3-5 will improve from 67% to 70% as evidenced by the 2026 FAST Assessment.
(View Marzano Model)
Helping students examine their reasoning
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
CER's related to grade level standards will be thoughtfully planned during collaborative planning.
Person Responsible:
Math Coach
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Lesson plans
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Teachers will implement the planned CER's to help students examine their reasoning.
Person Responsible:
Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
FTEM
Action #3
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
During Collaborative Planning, teams will analyze the impact of students examining their reasoning based on student data.
Person Responsible:
Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
End of Unit Assessments, weekly formative assessments
Action #4
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Effective interventions will be implemented to provide further support for students, based on data discussed during MTSS meetings.
Person Responsible:
Resource Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
SSP data
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
The overall Science proficiency levels in grade 5 will improve from 64% to 67% as evidenced by the 2026 Statewide Science Assessment.
(View Marzano Model)
Helping students examine their reasoning
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
CER's related to grade level standards will be thoughtfully planned during collaborative planning.
Person Responsible:
Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Lesson Plans
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Teachers will implement the planned CER's to help students examine their reasoning.
Person Responsible:
Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
FTEM
Action #3
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Students will use Science Notebooks to record their scientific reasoning, which can be used for reference and a place to revise and expand on their thinking.
Person Responsible:
Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Student Science Notebooks, formative assessments
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
No response.
(View Marzano Model)
No response.
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
No response.
(View Marzano Model)
No response.
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
No response.
(View Marzano Model)
No response.
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!

Schoolwide Program Plan (SWP) Requirements

This section must be completed if the school is implementing a Title I, Part A SWP and opts to use the SIP to satisfy the requirements of the SWP plan, as outlined in the ESSA, Public Law No. 114-95, § 1114(b). This section is not required for non-Title I schools.

Budget Document Uploads

No files uploaded
1.

Provide the methods for dissemination of this SIP, UniSIG budget and SWP to stakeholders (e.g., students, families, school staff and leadership and local businesses and organizations). Please articulate a plan or protocol for how this SIP and progress will be shared and disseminated and to the extent practicable, provided in a language a parent can understand. (ESSA 1114(b)(4))

List the school's webpage* where the SIP is made publicly available.
* A webpage is not sufficient as the sole method of dissemination.

The SIP is shared during the School Advisory Council meeting at the beginning of the school year. Throughout the year, progress toward our SIP goals will be shared quarterly at SAC meetings. Additionally, the SIP is available for review on the school website, and there is a copy in the front office.

2.

Describe how the school plans to build positive relationships with parents, families and other community stakeholders to fulfill the school’s mission, support the needs of students and keep parents informed of their child’s progress.

List the school's webpage* where the school's Family Engagement Plan is made publicly available. (ESSA 1116(b-g))
* A webpage is not sufficient as the sole method of dissemination.

Building positive relationships with all stakeholders has been one of our biggest missions this school year. We began the year by hosting back to school events at two of the major apartment complexes that feed into our school. Teachers are communicating with each family in their classrooms through conferences and phone calls. Administration conducts home visits regularly when we have difficulty reaching a parents. Additionally, the school website (collierschools/MDE) has the PFEP available for review.

3.

Describe how the school plans to strengthen the academic program in the school, increase the amount and quality of learning time and help provide an enriched and accelerated curriculum. Include the Area of Focus if addressed in Part II of the SIP. (ESSA 1114(b)(7)ii))

MTSS meetings are held every 6 weeks to review formative assessment data and make instructional decisions based on data. Through these meetings, students in need of additional support are identified, as well as students who would benefit from enrichments opportunities. During weekly collaborative planning, thoughtful differentiation is planned, which is then implemented in classrooms the following week.

4.

If appropriate and applicable, describe how this plan is developed in coordination and integration with other Federal, State, and local services, resources and programs, such as programs supported under ESSA, violence prevention programs, nutrition programs, housing programs, Head Start programs, adult education programs, career and technical education programs, and schools implementing CSI or TSI activities under section 1111(d). (ESSA 1114(b)(5))

• Collier County Public Schools implement a systematic and strategic approach to service delivery through the District Strategic Plan and the K–12 Comprehensive Reading Plan. The goals and objectives of each program and department are aligned with these overarching district plans. • Title I (Parts A, C, D), UniSIG, Title II (Part A), and Title IV are managed within the same department. These programs share administrative staff to ensure efficient oversight, coordination, budgeting, staffing, and monitoring. Informal communication and monthly administrative meetings support ongoing collaboration and alignment of efforts. • Leadership staff from Title I (Parts A, C, D), Title II, Title III, Title IV, Head Start/VPK, and Title IX programs meet monthly to coordinate services and participate in joint professional development aimed at improving program effectiveness. • Teaching & Learning (T&L) department meetings include program coordinators from IDEA, Perkins, Head Start, and Career and Technical Education, fostering cross-program collaboration. • The Title IX and Title I (Parts A and C) Coordinators work together to identify and support homeless children, assisting with registration and providing necessary services. Title I and the District jointly fund the Homeless Liaison, who supports homeless students across all schools. • Title I (Parts A and C) and Title III funds are coordinated to provide supplemental instructional support and resources to at-risk students.

CSI, TSI and ATSI Resource Review

Describe the process to review school improvement funding allocations and ensure resources are allocated based on needs. This section must be completed if the school is identified as ATSI, TSI or CSI in addition to completing an Area(s) of Focus identifying interventions and activities within the SIP (ESSA 1111(d)(1)(B)(4) and (d)(2)(C).

No response.

Reading Achievement Initiative for Scholastic Excellence (RAISE)

For the 2025-2026 school year, the criteria includes schools with students in grades three through five where 50 percent or more of its students, in any grade level, score below a level 3 on the most recent statewide English Language Arts (ELA) assessment; or progress monitoring data collected from the coordinated screening and progress monitoring system pursuant to s. 1008.25(9), F.S., shows that 50 percent or more of the students are not on track to pass the statewide, standardized grade 3 ELA assessment for any grade level kindergarten through grade 3; and at least 10 students must be present for both the second and third full-time equivalent (FTE) survey periods and must be enrolled at the time of the statewide, standardized testing.

Include a description of your Area of Focus (Instructional Practice specifically relating to Reading/ELA) for each grade below, how it affects student learning in literacy, and a rationale that explains how it was identified as a critical need from the data reviewed. Data that should be used to determine the critical need should include, at a minimum:

  • The percentage of students below Level 3 on the 2024−2025 statewide, standardized ELA assessment. Identification criteria must include each grade that has 50 percent or more students scoring below Level 3 in grades 3-5 on the statewide, standardized ELA assessment.
  • The percentage of students in kindergarten through grade 3, based on 2024−2025 coordinated screening and progress monitoring system data, who are not on track to score Level 3 or above on the statewide, standardized ELA assessment.
  • Other forms of data that should be considered: formative, progress monitoring and diagnostic assessment data.
1.

Grades K-2: Instructional Practice specifically relating to Reading/ELA

In grades K-2, Fundations is being delivered daily in a systematic way in order to boost the reading proficiency for all students. Students who are identified as needing additional support receive additional small group support in Fundations from their classroom teacher, as well as a resource teacher if deemed necessary through data analysis.
2.

Grades 3-5: Instructional Practice specifically related to Reading/ELA

In grades 3-5, weekly formative assessments are analyzed during collaborative planning in order to determine which students need additional support. Effective interventions are also implemented after students are identified during MTSS meetings every six weeks. Additionally, we have identified the level 1 students in WIDA, and Lexia Language is being used to boost their language acquisition. Fundations is also being implemented with fidelity in third grade.

School Advisory Council (SAC)

NameGroupEthnicityMigrant StatusDistrict EmployeeRoleStart of TermEnd of Term
No Council member found!
GroupNumber%
Community/Business00.0
Non-instructional Staff00.0
Parent00.0
Principal00.0
Students (required for HS; optional for MS)00.0
Teachers00.0
The number of non-employees must be at least 51% of the total SAC membership.
NOTE: The Principal is included in the district employee count.
GroupNumberPercent
District Employee 00.0
Non-District Employee 00.0
SAC membership must be representative (within 15%) of the ethnic, racial and socio-economic community served by the school. NOTE: The principal is NOT included in the demographic composition breakdown.
EthnicityNumber% SAC% Students
 00.00.0
Black00.021.9
Hispanic00.059.2
Others00.011.4
White00.07.6
Date

Existing Uploads

No Bylaws files have been uploaded yet.