School Year
 Back to School List

Data Analysis - Needs Assessment

PatternELAMathScienceSocial Studies
What trends emerge across grade levels, subgroups, and core content areas?
From PM3 SY 24-25 3rd: All -7 ESE -12 ELL -44 ADV +18 L25 4th: All +7 ESE +18 ELL +25 ADV +20 L25 +20 5th: All +10 ESE +17 ELL +50 ADV +25 L25 +28
From PM3 SY 24-25 K and 1st - Increase for all and ELL, decrease for ESE. 2nd Grade - Decrease for all subgroups (minor decreases). 3rd: All -10 ESE +3 ELL -25 ADV +3 L25 100% 4th: All +3 ESE +39 ELL +32 ADV +3 L25 56% 5th: All -5 ESE -9 ELL -4 ADV +16 (100%) L25 29% *Gains for all subgroups from PM1 to PM3
Gains in All (+6), ESE (+15), and ELL (+50).
NA
Which data component showed the most improvement? What new actions did your school take in this area?
4th increased L3 and higher in all subgroups in both ELA and Math. 5th grade in ELA, increase in L3 and higher. Advanced increased L3 and higher in all grades (3-5) in both ELA and Math! Schedule plays a huge role in the increase and even limited decreases across all subgroups in both 4th and 5th grades! Staffing as well (we have changes semester 2 for both 4th and 5th grade teams).
Which data component showed the lowest performance? Explain the contributing factor(s) to last year's low performance and discuss any trends.
3rd Grade ELL in both ELA and Math.
Which data component showed the greatest decline from the prior year? Explain the factor(s) that contributed to this decline.
3rd grade: -All both ELA and Math decrease -ELA and Math ELL decrease -ESE ELA decrease 5th Math ESE decrease -9
Which data component had the greatest gap when compared to the state average? Explain the factor(s) that contributed to this gap and any trends. State data can be found here.
We preformed above the district and state in all three areas. Science is the area with greatest positive gap. We are proud of this gain and "crushing" our SIP Science goal (for all subgroups) -ELA 3rd +19, 4th +30, 5th +30 -Math 3rd +20, +30, +23 -Science +34
Rank your highest priorities (maximum of 5) for school improvement in the upcoming school year.
1. 3rd grade - planning to ensure we are planning for all students not just the Advanced students. 2. Gains Met

SIP - Areas of Focus

Our vision is to empower students to be leaders who inspire creativity, demonstrate integrity, and embrace resilience. Together, we strive to develop a generation of lifelong learners who are ready to make a positive impact in the world.  
At Veterans Memorial Elementary School, we provide an environment where students develop creativity, resilience, and a love for learning. Through strong partnerships with parents and the community, we support students in reaching their full potential and becoming kind, responsible leaders.
By May 2026, we will increase our ELA learning gains from to 71% to 74% as evidenced by PM3 FAST.
(View Marzano Model)
Using Questions to Help Students Elaborate on Content.
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Professional Learning - Monthly professional learning will take place with a focus on Using Questions to Help Students Elaborate on Content.
Person Responsible:
Chelsea Geroy, Literacy Coach
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Staff will be monitored for use of strategies during the professional learning sessions.
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Planning - During collaborative planning teachers will plan, using strategies learned at monthly professional learning sessions, Using Questions to Help Students Elaborate on Content.
Person Responsible:
ELA Teachers and Instructional support staff
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Monitoring of collaborative planning and submitted lesson plans to ensure strategies planned for are aligned to Using Questions to Help Students Elaborate on Content.
Action #3
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Implementation of Evidence-based Strategy - Teachers will implement the planned lessons and strategies aligned to Using Questions to Help Students Elaborate on Content.
Person Responsible:
ELA Teachers and Instructional support staff
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Administration will conduct bi-weekly grade level swoops and provide specific feedback aligned to Using Questions to Help Students Elaborate on Content and SWIRL Look Fors.
Action #4
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Measuring Impact - During PLCs, the team will analyze student data and share best practices.
Person Responsible:
Chelsea Geroy, Literacy Coach, Jocelyn Badiu, ESE Program Specialist, & Administration
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Formative Data (in DW), common grade level assessments, and PM data.
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
By May 2026, we will increase our Math lowest 25% learning gains met from 54% to 60% as evidenced by PM3 FAST.
(View Marzano Model)
Helping Students Revise Knowledge.
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Professional Learning - Monthly professional learning will take place with a focus on Using Questions to Help Students Elaborate on Content and Helping Students Revise Knowledge.
Person Responsible:
Instructional Staff
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Staff will be monitored for use of strategies during the professional learning sessions.
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Planning - During collaborative planning teachers will plan, using strategies learned at monthly professional learning sessions, Using Questions to Help Students Elaborate on Content and Helping Students Revise Knowledge.
Person Responsible:
Instructional Staff
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Monitoring of collaborative planning and submitted lesson plans to ensure strategies planned for are aligned to Using Questions to Help Students Elaborate on Content and Helping Students Revise Knowledge.
Action #3
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Implementation of Evidence-based Strategy - Teachers will implement the planned lessons and strategies aligned to Using Questions to Help Students Elaborate on Content and Helping Students Revise Knowledge.
Person Responsible:
Instructional Staff
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Administration will conduct bi-weekly grade level swoops and provide specific feedback aligned to Using Questions to Help Students Elaborate on Content, Helping Students Revise Knowledge, and SWIRL Look Fors.
Action #4
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Measuring Impact - During PLCs, the team will analyze student data and share best practices.
Person Responsible:
Math Teachers and ESE Instructional Support
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Formative Data (in DW), common grade level assessments, and PM data.
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
By May 2026, we will increase our Science ESE subgroup proficiency from 57% to 60% as evidenced by PM3 FAST.
(View Marzano Model)
Helping Students Practice Skills Strategies and Processes
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Professional Learning - Data PLCs will take place after quarterly district QBAs.
Person Responsible:
Science Teachers, ESE Instructional Support, EL
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
PLC Data Notes
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Planning - During collaborative planning teachers will plan for front loading vocabulary and planning for hands-on experiences while keeping in mind the school-wide Deliberate Practice element and the Science evidence-based strategy.
Person Responsible:
Science Teachers, Instructional Support Staff, & Administration
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Lesson plans, Student progress on Progress Learning
Action #3
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Implementation of Evidence- based Strategy - Teachers will implement the planned lessons and strategies aligned to Using Questions to Help Students Elaborate on Content and Helping Students Practice Skills, Strategies, and Processes.
Person Responsible:
Science Teachers, Instructional Support Staff
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
SWIRL look fors and classroom assessment data
Action #4
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Measuring of Impact - During PLCs, the team will analyze student data and share best practices.
Person Responsible:
Instructional Staff & Administration
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Formative Data (in DW), common grade level assessments, and district QBA data.
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
No response.
(View Marzano Model)
No response.
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
No response.
Person Responsible:
No response.
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
No response.
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
No response.
Person Responsible:
No response.
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
No response.
Action #3
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
No response.
Person Responsible:
No response.
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
No response.
Action #4
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
No response.
Person Responsible:
No response.
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
No response.
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
No response.
(View Marzano Model)
No response.
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
By May 2026, we will recognize 100% of VME students having a leadership role in the classroom or across campus.
(View Marzano Model)
Providing Feedback and Celebrating Progress​
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
All Students will have a leadership role
Person Responsible:
All Staff
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Leadership Role Tracker
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
All students will have the opportunity to be a Patriot of the Week and/or the Leader of the Month
Person Responsible:
All Staff
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Leadership Binders
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!

Schoolwide Program Plan (SWP) Requirements

This section must be completed if the school is implementing a Title I, Part A SWP and opts to use the SIP to satisfy the requirements of the SWP plan, as outlined in the ESSA, Public Law No. 114-95, § 1114(b). This section is not required for non-Title I schools.

Budget Document Uploads

No files uploaded
1.

Provide the methods for dissemination of this SIP, UniSIG budget and SWP to stakeholders (e.g., students, families, school staff and leadership and local businesses and organizations). Please articulate a plan or protocol for how this SIP and progress will be shared and disseminated and to the extent practicable, provided in a language a parent can understand. (ESSA 1114(b)(4))

List the school's webpage* where the SIP is made publicly available.
* A webpage is not sufficient as the sole method of dissemination.

No response.

2.

Describe how the school plans to build positive relationships with parents, families and other community stakeholders to fulfill the school’s mission, support the needs of students and keep parents informed of their child’s progress.

List the school's webpage* where the school's Family Engagement Plan is made publicly available. (ESSA 1116(b-g))
* A webpage is not sufficient as the sole method of dissemination.

No response.

3.

Describe how the school plans to strengthen the academic program in the school, increase the amount and quality of learning time and help provide an enriched and accelerated curriculum. Include the Area of Focus if addressed in Part II of the SIP. (ESSA 1114(b)(7)ii))

No response.

4.

If appropriate and applicable, describe how this plan is developed in coordination and integration with other Federal, State, and local services, resources and programs, such as programs supported under ESSA, violence prevention programs, nutrition programs, housing programs, Head Start programs, adult education programs, career and technical education programs, and schools implementing CSI or TSI activities under section 1111(d). (ESSA 1114(b)(5))

No response.

CSI, TSI and ATSI Resource Review

Describe the process to review school improvement funding allocations and ensure resources are allocated based on needs. This section must be completed if the school is identified as ATSI, TSI or CSI in addition to completing an Area(s) of Focus identifying interventions and activities within the SIP (ESSA 1111(d)(1)(B)(4) and (d)(2)(C).

No response.

Reading Achievement Initiative for Scholastic Excellence (RAISE)

For the 2025-2026 school year, the criteria includes schools with students in grades three through five where 50 percent or more of its students, in any grade level, score below a level 3 on the most recent statewide English Language Arts (ELA) assessment; or progress monitoring data collected from the coordinated screening and progress monitoring system pursuant to s. 1008.25(9), F.S., shows that 50 percent or more of the students are not on track to pass the statewide, standardized grade 3 ELA assessment for any grade level kindergarten through grade 3; and at least 10 students must be present for both the second and third full-time equivalent (FTE) survey periods and must be enrolled at the time of the statewide, standardized testing.

Include a description of your Area of Focus (Instructional Practice specifically relating to Reading/ELA) for each grade below, how it affects student learning in literacy, and a rationale that explains how it was identified as a critical need from the data reviewed. Data that should be used to determine the critical need should include, at a minimum:

  • The percentage of students below Level 3 on the 2024−2025 statewide, standardized ELA assessment. Identification criteria must include each grade that has 50 percent or more students scoring below Level 3 in grades 3-5 on the statewide, standardized ELA assessment.
  • The percentage of students in kindergarten through grade 3, based on 2024−2025 coordinated screening and progress monitoring system data, who are not on track to score Level 3 or above on the statewide, standardized ELA assessment.
  • Other forms of data that should be considered: formative, progress monitoring and diagnostic assessment data.
1.

Grades K-2: Instructional Practice specifically relating to Reading/ELA

No reponse.
2.

Grades 3-5: Instructional Practice specifically related to Reading/ELA

No reponse.

School Advisory Council (SAC)

NameGroupEthnicityMigrant StatusDistrict EmployeeRoleStart of TermEnd of Term
Jessica Vieira Principal White Non-Migrant Yes Principal 8/26/2025 8/26/2026
Nolan Thune Parent Hispanic Non-Migrant No Member 8/26/2025 8/26/2026
Kelly McCann Parent White Non-Migrant No SAC Chair 8/26/2025 8/26/2026
Melody Singh Non-instructional Staff White Non-Migrant Yes Secretary 8/26/2025 8/26/2026
Dan McDonald Community/Business White Non-Migrant No Member 8/26/2025 8/26/2026
Frank Kupiac Parent White Non-Migrant No Member 8/26/2025 8/26/2026
Daniela De Pietto Parent Others Non-Migrant Yes Member 8/26/2025 8/26/2026
Stepahnie Ahasic Parent White Non-Migrant No Member 9/9/2025 11/12/2026
Orly Lawler Parent Hispanic Non-Migrant No Member 9/9/2025 11/12/2026
Melissa Nilson Parent White Non-Migrant No Member 9/9/2025 11/12/2026
Kristen Pukin Teachers White Non-Migrant Yes Member 9/9/2025 11/12/2026
GroupNumber%
Community/Business19.1
Non-instructional Staff19.1
Parent763.6
Principal19.1
Students (required for HS; optional for MS)00.0
Teachers19.1
The number of non-employees must be at least 51% of the total SAC membership.
NOTE: The Principal is included in the district employee count.
GroupNumberPercent
District Employee 436.4
Non-District Employee 763.6
SAC membership must be representative (within 15%) of the ethnic, racial and socio-economic community served by the school. NOTE: The principal is NOT included in the demographic composition breakdown.
EthnicityNumber% SAC% Students
 00.00.0
Black00.01.9
Hispanic220.022.5
Others110.09.9
White770.065.7
Date & TimeTitleLocationUploaded Files
Tuesday, September 9, 2025 5:30 PMSeptember SAC MeetingVME Media Center
Tuesday, October 7, 2025 5:30 PMOctober SAC MeetingVME Media Center
Tuesday, November 11, 2025 5:30 PMNovember SAC MeetingVME Media Center
Tuesday, January 13, 2026 5:30 PMJanuary SAC MeetingVME Media Center
Tuesday, February 10, 2026 5:30 PMFebruary SAC MeetingVME Media Center
No uploads...
Tuesday, March 24, 2026 5:30 PMMarch SAC MeetingVME Media Center
No uploads...
Tuesday, April 14, 2026 5:30 PMApril SAC MeetingVME Media Center
No uploads...
Tuesday, May 12, 2026 5:30 PMMay SAC MeetingVME Media Center
No uploads...
Date

Existing Uploads