School Year
 Back to School List

Data Analysis - Needs Assessment

PatternELAMathScienceSocial Studies
What trends emerge across grade levels, subgroups, and core content areas?
Increase over all in all grades. Slight decrease in Lowest 25% in grades 6 and 8.
Increase over all in every grade.
Increase of 10% from prior year.
Increase by 8% from prior year. ESE proficiency increase.
Which data component showed the most improvement? What new actions did your school take in this area?
Science proficiency showed the largest improvement with 10%. Increased inclusion support in classes assisted with the increased proficiency.
Which data component showed the lowest performance? Explain the contributing factor(s) to last year's low performance and discuss any trends.
We continue to focus on our ELL and ESE population to increase proficiency in all areas.
Which data component showed the greatest decline from the prior year? Explain the factor(s) that contributed to this decline.
6th grade math proficiency overall showed a slight decline from prior year (91% to 86%).
Which data component had the greatest gap when compared to the state average? Explain the factor(s) that contributed to this gap and any trends. State data can be found here.
None
Rank your highest priorities (maximum of 5) for school improvement in the upcoming school year.
1. Maintain and increase rigor to support level 4 and 5 students. 2. Continue to focus on strategies to increase science proficiency. 3. School wide goal of increasing parent/school communication. 4. School wide Marzano Element focus on helping students revise their knowledge.

SIP - Areas of Focus

To provide a healthy, safe, and academically rigorous learning environment in order to create responsible citizens and leaders who will make a positive impact on our community now and in the future.
North Naples Middle School strives to be a full learning community that involves teachers, staff, parents, and students to create a uniquely powerful learning environment.
By teachers giving their students an opportunity to revise their knowledge, we will increase the percentage of students meeting grade level proficiency in ELA will increase from 79% to 82% by the end of the 2026 school year as measured by the FAST progress monitoring 3 assessment.
(View Marzano Model)
North Naples Middle will focus on practicing the Marzano element of Helping Students Revise Their Knowledge to increase student achievement from 79 percent to 82 percent.
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Professional development focused on assigning culminating tasks that ask students to demonstrate their developing knowledge and understanding of a topic through integrated skills (e.g. combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening) that result in students correcting errors and misconceptions or adding new information. Swirl will be our predominant strategy that supports students to revise their knowledge
Person Responsible:
ELA teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Monitoring of collaborative planning
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Teacher will partake in peer observations with literacy coach to see best practices of the Marzano element helping students to help students revise knowledge. Collaborative Planning and using strategies in professional development
Person Responsible:
ELA Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Monitoring of collaborative planning
Action #3
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Focus on strategies that align with helping students revise knowledge and assist teachers with Tier 1 instruction. Strategies will include SWIRL, scaffolding, modeling, and higher order thinking.
Person Responsible:
ALL Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Observations and weekly classroom walk throughs
Action #4
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
During PLC meetings, staff will collaborate to measure impact bimonthly. Administration will meet quarterly with individual teachers to monitor academic progress of all students in the teachers classes.
Person Responsible:
ALL Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
PLC reflections
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
By teachers giving their students an opportunity to revise their knowledge, we will increase the percentage of students meeting grade level proficiency in Math from 81% to 83% by the end of the 2026 school year as measured by the FAST progress monitoring 3 assessment
(View Marzano Model)
By teachers asking their students to revise previous knowledge by correcting errors and misconceptions as well as adding new information.
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Professional development focused on revising understanding of key mathematical ideas over time (e.g. articular understanding of the meaning of operations as they grow to accommodate the expanding number system from counting numbers to fractions to rational numbers to complex numbers)
Person Responsible:
Math Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
FTEM observations and classroom walk throughs
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Common Planning to discuss the standards and skills and focus on strategies that align with helping students revise knowledge and assist teachers with Tier 1 instruction. Strategies will include SWIRL, scaffolding, modeling, and higher order thinking.
Person Responsible:
Math department
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
PLC documentation
Action #3
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Teacher will partake in peer observations with literacy coach to see best practices of the Marzano element helping students to revise previous knowledge by correcting errors and misconceptions as well as adding new information.
Person Responsible:
Math Department
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
PLC documentation, FTEM observation reflection documentation
Action #4
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Provide ongoing, individualized feedback to teachers on their use of revising student knowledge strategies.
Person Responsible:
Admin Team
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
FTEM reports, resources
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
By teachers giving their students an opportunity to revise their knowledge, we will increase the percentage of students meeting grade level proficiency in Science from 71% to 80% by the end of the 2026 school year as measured by the FAST progress monitoring 3 assessment.
(View Marzano Model)
Teacher helps students revise previous knowledge by correcting errors and misconceptions as well as adding new information.
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Professional development focused on assigning culminating tasks that ask students to demonstrate their developing knowledge and understanding of a topic through integrated skills (e.g. combination of reading, writing, speaking, listening) that result in students correcting errors and misconceptions or adding new information. Swirl will be our predominant strategy that supports students to revise their knowledge
Person Responsible:
All Teaches
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Monitoring of collaborative planning
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Collaborative Planning and using strategies in professional development to help students revise knowledge. Focus on strategies that align with helping students revise knowledge and assist teachers with Tier 1 instruction. Strategies will include SWIRL, scaffolding, modeling, and higher order thinking.
Person Responsible:
Science teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Monitoring of collaborative planning
Action #3
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Provide ongoing, individualized feedback to teachers on their use of revising students knowledge strategies.
Person Responsible:
Science teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
FTEM observations, PLC reflections, resources
Action #4
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Quarterly (Benchmark) data chats to focus on individual students understanding of current content and strategies to advance the student's learning.
Person Responsible:
Science teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Benchmark, and PM1 and 2 scores
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
No response.
(View Marzano Model)
No response.
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
No response.
(View Marzano Model)
No response.
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
Enhance teacher-parent communication to support student success by ensuring that each teacher communicates with the parents/guardians of all students at least once per grading period with personalized, academic-focused updates. By May 2026, at least 90% of teachers will document consistent, two-way communication with 100% of their students' families each quarter, as tracked through a school-monitored communication log.
(View Marzano Model)
Provide training and tools for teachers to effectively use communication platforms (e.g., Remind, TalkingPoints, ClassDojo, or email), and allocate time during professional development for parent outreach planning.
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Grow collaborative partnerships with parents and the school
Person Responsible:
All Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Parent, staff surveys and communication logs
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Professional development on how to effectively communicate with parents.
Person Responsible:
All Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Parent, staff surveys and communication logs
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!

Schoolwide Program Plan (SWP) Requirements

This section must be completed if the school is implementing a Title I, Part A SWP and opts to use the SIP to satisfy the requirements of the SWP plan, as outlined in the ESSA, Public Law No. 114-95, § 1114(b). This section is not required for non-Title I schools.

Budget Document Uploads

No files uploaded
1.

Provide the methods for dissemination of this SIP, UniSIG budget and SWP to stakeholders (e.g., students, families, school staff and leadership and local businesses and organizations). Please articulate a plan or protocol for how this SIP and progress will be shared and disseminated and to the extent practicable, provided in a language a parent can understand. (ESSA 1114(b)(4))

List the school's webpage* where the SIP is made publicly available.
* A webpage is not sufficient as the sole method of dissemination.

No response.

2.

Describe how the school plans to build positive relationships with parents, families and other community stakeholders to fulfill the school’s mission, support the needs of students and keep parents informed of their child’s progress.

List the school's webpage* where the school's Family Engagement Plan is made publicly available. (ESSA 1116(b-g))
* A webpage is not sufficient as the sole method of dissemination.

No response.

3.

Describe how the school plans to strengthen the academic program in the school, increase the amount and quality of learning time and help provide an enriched and accelerated curriculum. Include the Area of Focus if addressed in Part II of the SIP. (ESSA 1114(b)(7)ii))

No response.

4.

If appropriate and applicable, describe how this plan is developed in coordination and integration with other Federal, State, and local services, resources and programs, such as programs supported under ESSA, violence prevention programs, nutrition programs, housing programs, Head Start programs, adult education programs, career and technical education programs, and schools implementing CSI or TSI activities under section 1111(d). (ESSA 1114(b)(5))

No response.

CSI, TSI and ATSI Resource Review

Describe the process to review school improvement funding allocations and ensure resources are allocated based on needs. This section must be completed if the school is identified as ATSI, TSI or CSI in addition to completing an Area(s) of Focus identifying interventions and activities within the SIP (ESSA 1111(d)(1)(B)(4) and (d)(2)(C).

No response.

Reading Achievement Initiative for Scholastic Excellence (RAISE)

For the 2025-2026 school year, the criteria includes schools with students in grades three through five where 50 percent or more of its students, in any grade level, score below a level 3 on the most recent statewide English Language Arts (ELA) assessment; or progress monitoring data collected from the coordinated screening and progress monitoring system pursuant to s. 1008.25(9), F.S., shows that 50 percent or more of the students are not on track to pass the statewide, standardized grade 3 ELA assessment for any grade level kindergarten through grade 3; and at least 10 students must be present for both the second and third full-time equivalent (FTE) survey periods and must be enrolled at the time of the statewide, standardized testing.

Include a description of your Area of Focus (Instructional Practice specifically relating to Reading/ELA) for each grade below, how it affects student learning in literacy, and a rationale that explains how it was identified as a critical need from the data reviewed. Data that should be used to determine the critical need should include, at a minimum:

  • The percentage of students below Level 3 on the 2024−2025 statewide, standardized ELA assessment. Identification criteria must include each grade that has 50 percent or more students scoring below Level 3 in grades 3-5 on the statewide, standardized ELA assessment.
  • The percentage of students in kindergarten through grade 3, based on 2024−2025 coordinated screening and progress monitoring system data, who are not on track to score Level 3 or above on the statewide, standardized ELA assessment.
  • Other forms of data that should be considered: formative, progress monitoring and diagnostic assessment data.
1.

Grades K-2: Instructional Practice specifically relating to Reading/ELA

No reponse.
2.

Grades 3-5: Instructional Practice specifically related to Reading/ELA

No reponse.

School Advisory Council (SAC)

NameGroupEthnicityMigrant StatusDistrict EmployeeRoleStart of TermEnd of Term
Jen Kass Parent White Non-Migrant No Vice Chair 10/6/2025 10/6/2026
Katya Ewy Parent White Non-Migrant No Member 10/6/2025 10/6/2026
Luigi Cassinelli Parent Others Non-Migrant No Member 10/6/2025 10/6/2026
Matt Kuk Community/Business White Non-Migrant No Member 10/6/2025 10/6/2026
Megan Kelly Parent White Non-Migrant No SAC Chair 10/6/2025 10/6/2026
Melissa Kuk Principal White Non-Migrant Yes Principal 10/6/2025 10/6/2026
Tiffany Osborne Parent White Non-Migrant No Member 10/6/2025 10/6/2026
Tomeka Thomas Non-instructional Staff Black Non-Migrant Yes Member 10/6/2025 10/6/2026
Tony Bower Parent White Non-Migrant No Member 10/6/2025 10/6/2026
Emily Link Parent White Non-Migrant No Member 10/6/2025 10/6/2026
Juan Perez Parent Hispanic Non-Migrant No Member 10/6/2025 10/6/2026
Katherine Dazs Parent Hispanic Non-Migrant No Member 10/6/2025 10/6/2026
Samantha Senkarik Teachers White Non-Migrant Yes Member 10/6/2025 10/6/2026
GroupNumber%
Community/Business17.7
Non-instructional Staff17.7
Parent969.2
Principal17.7
Students (required for HS; optional for MS)00.0
Teachers17.7
The number of non-employees must be at least 51% of the total SAC membership.
NOTE: The Principal is included in the district employee count.
GroupNumberPercent
District Employee 323.1
Non-District Employee 1076.9
SAC membership must be representative (within 15%) of the ethnic, racial and socio-economic community served by the school. NOTE: The principal is NOT included in the demographic composition breakdown.
EthnicityNumber% SAC% Students
 00.00.0
Black18.34.0
Hispanic216.722.3
Others18.37.4
White866.766.3
Date & TimeTitleLocationUploaded Files
Thursday, September 4, 2025 5:30 PMSAC agendamedia center
Wednesday, October 1, 2025 5:30 PMSAC agenda 10/1media center
No uploads...
Thursday, November 6, 2025 5:30 PMSAC agenda 11-6media center
No uploads...
Thursday, December 4, 2025 5:30 PMSAC agenda 12-4media center
No uploads...
Thursday, January 8, 2026 5:30 PMSAC agenda 1-8media center
No uploads...
Thursday, February 5, 2026 5:30 PMSAC agenda 2-5media center
No uploads...
Thursday, March 5, 2026 5:30 PMSAC agenda 3-5media center
No uploads...
Thursday, April 2, 2026 5:30 PMSAC agenda 4-2media center
No uploads...
Date

Existing Uploads