School Year
 Back to School List

Data Analysis - Needs Assessment

PatternELAMathScienceSocial Studies
What trends emerge across grade levels, subgroups, and core content areas?
Overall proficiency increase of 8% -Growth in profciency at all grade levels from SY24 -6th Grade Subgroups (ESE, ELL, ADV, L25) increase in proficiency -7th Grade subgroups (ESE, ADV, L25) increase in proficiency except ELL -8th Grade subgroups (ESE, ELL, L25) increase in proficiency except ADV
Overall decrease in proficiency by 6% -6th grade decrease in proficiency -7th and 8th grade increase in proficiency from SY25 -All subgroups ESE,ELL decrease in proficiency. -6th grad ADV subgroups increase in proficiency by 1% -7th grade increase in proficiency by 8% 7th grade ESE subgroup increase in proficiency 7th grade ELL subgroup decline in proficiency
Gains by 1% compared to SY25 Below district average by 2% All subgroups made gains
Increase in proficiency by 4%
Which data component showed the most improvement? What new actions did your school take in this area?
-6th grade ELA and 8th grade ELA, and 7th grade math -Actions in ELA include focused plannings sessions with Reading Coach and Teachers. Use of Lexia resources and reports to support ELL and Tier 2/3 interventions. Helping students with practicing skills, strategies and processes in small groups. -Actions in Math include focused planning sessions with grade level teams. District TSA support. Effective small grouping based on specific gaps in content areas. -Strong focus on co-teaching support in intensive classes.
Which data component showed the lowest performance? Explain the contributing factor(s) to last year's low performance and discuss any trends.
6th grade ESE math, 6th grade ELL ELA, 8th grade math -Lack of differentiated instruction in 6th-grade ELL ELA classes -Inconsistent implementation of interventions for Tier 2/3 students in math
Which data component showed the greatest decline from the prior year? Explain the factor(s) that contributed to this decline.
6th grade math ESE subgroup, Algebra ELL subgroup, Civics ELL subgroup -ESE co-teacher in 6th-grade math intervened with whole-group instruction. -One ELL Tutor to support all ELL students in sheltered ELA classes.
Which data component had the greatest gap when compared to the state average? Explain the factor(s) that contributed to this gap and any trends. State data can be found here.
8th grade math (State-54%, CMS-43%) -Inconsistent implementation of interventions for Tier 2/3 students in math
Rank your highest priorities (maximum of 5) for school improvement in the upcoming school year.
1. Standards-based instruction 2. Support and interventions for L25% in ELA and Math 3. Focus on streamlining MTSS systems and procedures. 4. Use of SWIRL in all content areas 5. Helping students identify similarities and differences in all content areas.

SIP - Areas of Focus

The vision of Corkscrew Middle is to foster a life long love of learning and achievement for every student by utilizing an on going partnership between school, family, and community.​​
The mission of Corkscrew Middle is to provide a positive learning environment where each student lifelong obtain intellectual growth and to pursue the development of good character in a safe learning environment.​
CMS students will make gains in ELA from 64% to 67% on PM3 by May of 2026.
(View Marzano Model)
Helping students examine similarities and differences will increase student achievement through analysis, classification, and making connections between concepts. When students actively compare, contrast, classify, or create analogies, they move beyond surface-level recall to deeper conceptual understanding.
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Provide professional development on effective summarization and classification strategies supported by the use of graphic organizers in different content areas.
Person Responsible:
Lisa Holtz, Grade Level Teacher Leaders
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Classroom observations & lesson plans
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Teachers will plan collaboratively how to implement comparing, classifying, creating metaphors and creating analogies to help students examine similarities and differences.
Person Responsible:
Lisa Holtz, ELA grade Level Teacher Leaders
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Classroom observations, lesson plans, collaborative planning sessions
Action #3
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Teachers will incorporate at least one structured similarity/difference activity per week tied to core texts, writing prompts, or standards-based skills.
Person Responsible:
All content area teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Classwork, activities, CERs, and graded assignments
Action #4
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Teachers will implement structured questioning strategies that prompt students to analyze similarities and differences across concepts, texts, and problems in all content areas.
Person Responsible:
All content area teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Lesson plans, observations, common assessments
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
CMS students will increase gains on the PM3 in math from 76% to 79% by May of 2026.
(View Marzano Model)
Helping students examine similarities and differences will increase student achievement through analysis, classification, and making connections between concepts. When students actively compare, contrast, classify, or create analogies, they move beyond surface-level recall to deeper conceptual understanding.
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Teachers will incorporate at least one structured similarity/difference activity per week tied to math problem solving equations or standards-based skills.
Person Responsible:
Math Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Classwork, activities, and graded assignments
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Teachers will plan collaboratively how to implement comparing, classifying, creating metaphors and creating analogies to help students examine similarities and differences.
Person Responsible:
Math Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Lesson plans, observations, common assessments
Action #3
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Teachers will provide structured opportunities for students to generate their own comparison questions during math units.
Person Responsible:
Math Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Lesson plans, observations, classwork, and graded assignments
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
CMS 8th grade students will increase proficiency from 56% to 59% on the NGSSS by May of 2026.
(View Marzano Model)
Helping students examine similarities and differences will increase student achievement through analysis, classification, and making connections between concepts. When students actively compare, contrast, classify, or create analogies, they move beyond surface-level recall to deeper conceptual understanding.
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Consistent PLC collaboration with focus on scaffolding strategies using the new DE resources.
Person Responsible:
All Science Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Common Assessments, PM2 Data
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Teachers will focus on strategies to help students examine similarities and differences, building vocabulary skills through comparing, classifying, creating metaphors, and creating analogies.
Person Responsible:
All Science Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Common Assessments, PM2 Data
Action #3
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Teachers will incorporate at least one structured similarity/difference activity per week tied to core texts, writing prompts, laboratory activities, or standards-based skills.
Person Responsible:
All Science Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Classwork, Common Assessments
Action #4
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Teachers will implement structured questioning strategies that prompt students to analyze similarities and differences across concepts, texts, and problems in all content areas.
Person Responsible:
All Science Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Lesson plans, observations, common assessments
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
No response.
(View Marzano Model)
No response.
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
Students in the lowest 25% subgroup will increase gains on the PM3 in math from 69% to 72% by May of 2026.
(View Marzano Model)
Helping students examine similarities and differences will increase student achievement through analysis, classification, and making connections between concepts. When students actively compare, contrast, classify, or create analogies, they move beyond surface-level recall to deeper conceptual understanding.
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Teachers will improve students’ conceptual understanding of mathematical processes and problem-solving by implementing structured opportunities to compare, classify, and analyze similarities/differences in mathematical concepts.
Person Responsible:
All Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Common Assessments, Classwork, PM Data
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
PLC collaboration with the Math department to analyze assessment data and identify standards and areas of concerns.
Person Responsible:
All Math Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Lesson plans, classwork, common assessments, graphic organizers
Action #3
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Teachers will model “think-alouds” demonstrating how to identify critical attributes that distinguish mathematical concepts and explicitly connect them to standards-aligned content.
Person Responsible:
All Math Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Observations, lesson plans, graphic organizers
Action #4
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Teachers will implement structured questioning strategies that prompt students to analyze similarities and differences across concepts, texts, and problems in all content areas.
Person Responsible:
All Math Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Lesson plans, observations, common assessments
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
During the 25-26 school year, major referrals will decrease by 3% from 979 to 950 or less by May of 2026.
(View Marzano Model)
Helping students examine similarities and differences will increase student engagement, thereby decreasing the number of referrals written during the 2025-2026 school year.
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Teachers will increase PBIS incentives in the classroom to celebrate students.
Person Responsible:
All Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Referral Data
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Increase of positive referrals and PBIS events to help build student morale.
Person Responsible:
All Teachers
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Referral data, positive referral data
Action #3
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Teachers and staff will implement schoolwide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) by explicitly teaching, modeling, and reinforcing the school’s behavioral expectations in all settings.
Person Responsible:
All Teachers & Administrators
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Referral data, positive referral data, student surveys
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!

Schoolwide Program Plan (SWP) Requirements

This section must be completed if the school is implementing a Title I, Part A SWP and opts to use the SIP to satisfy the requirements of the SWP plan, as outlined in the ESSA, Public Law No. 114-95, § 1114(b). This section is not required for non-Title I schools.

Budget Document Uploads

No files uploaded
1.

Provide the methods for dissemination of this SIP, UniSIG budget and SWP to stakeholders (e.g., students, families, school staff and leadership and local businesses and organizations). Please articulate a plan or protocol for how this SIP and progress will be shared and disseminated and to the extent practicable, provided in a language a parent can understand. (ESSA 1114(b)(4))

List the school's webpage* where the SIP is made publicly available.
* A webpage is not sufficient as the sole method of dissemination.

No response.

2.

Describe how the school plans to build positive relationships with parents, families and other community stakeholders to fulfill the school’s mission, support the needs of students and keep parents informed of their child’s progress.

List the school's webpage* where the school's Family Engagement Plan is made publicly available. (ESSA 1116(b-g))
* A webpage is not sufficient as the sole method of dissemination.

No response.

3.

Describe how the school plans to strengthen the academic program in the school, increase the amount and quality of learning time and help provide an enriched and accelerated curriculum. Include the Area of Focus if addressed in Part II of the SIP. (ESSA 1114(b)(7)ii))

No response.

4.

If appropriate and applicable, describe how this plan is developed in coordination and integration with other Federal, State, and local services, resources and programs, such as programs supported under ESSA, violence prevention programs, nutrition programs, housing programs, Head Start programs, adult education programs, career and technical education programs, and schools implementing CSI or TSI activities under section 1111(d). (ESSA 1114(b)(5))

No response.

CSI, TSI and ATSI Resource Review

Describe the process to review school improvement funding allocations and ensure resources are allocated based on needs. This section must be completed if the school is identified as ATSI, TSI or CSI in addition to completing an Area(s) of Focus identifying interventions and activities within the SIP (ESSA 1111(d)(1)(B)(4) and (d)(2)(C).

No response.

Reading Achievement Initiative for Scholastic Excellence (RAISE)

For the 2025-2026 school year, the criteria includes schools with students in grades three through five where 50 percent or more of its students, in any grade level, score below a level 3 on the most recent statewide English Language Arts (ELA) assessment; or progress monitoring data collected from the coordinated screening and progress monitoring system pursuant to s. 1008.25(9), F.S., shows that 50 percent or more of the students are not on track to pass the statewide, standardized grade 3 ELA assessment for any grade level kindergarten through grade 3; and at least 10 students must be present for both the second and third full-time equivalent (FTE) survey periods and must be enrolled at the time of the statewide, standardized testing.

Include a description of your Area of Focus (Instructional Practice specifically relating to Reading/ELA) for each grade below, how it affects student learning in literacy, and a rationale that explains how it was identified as a critical need from the data reviewed. Data that should be used to determine the critical need should include, at a minimum:

  • The percentage of students below Level 3 on the 2024−2025 statewide, standardized ELA assessment. Identification criteria must include each grade that has 50 percent or more students scoring below Level 3 in grades 3-5 on the statewide, standardized ELA assessment.
  • The percentage of students in kindergarten through grade 3, based on 2024−2025 coordinated screening and progress monitoring system data, who are not on track to score Level 3 or above on the statewide, standardized ELA assessment.
  • Other forms of data that should be considered: formative, progress monitoring and diagnostic assessment data.
1.

Grades K-2: Instructional Practice specifically relating to Reading/ELA

No reponse.
2.

Grades 3-5: Instructional Practice specifically related to Reading/ELA

No reponse.

School Advisory Council (SAC)

NameGroupEthnicityMigrant StatusDistrict EmployeeRoleStart of TermEnd of Term
Lindsey Allen Teachers White Non-Migrant Yes Member 8/31/2025 8/31/2026
Stacey Clemmenson Parent White Non-Migrant Yes SAC Chair 8/31/2025 8/31/2026
Rania Peacock Principal Black Non-Migrant Yes Principal 8/31/2025 8/31/2026
Maria Gutierrez Parent Hispanic Non-Migrant No Member 8/31/2025 8/31/2026
Candida Harris Parent Hispanic Non-Migrant No Secretary 8/31/2025 8/31/2026
Rebecca Calabrese Parent White Non-Migrant No Member 8/31/2025 8/31/2026
Yoagna Suarez Del Villar Parent Hispanic Non-Migrant No Member 9/3/2025 9/3/2026
Claudia Londono Non-instructional Staff Hispanic Non-Migrant Yes Member 9/3/2025 9/3/2026
Lisa Holtz Teachers White Non-Migrant Yes Member 9/3/2025 9/3/2026
Jose Patino Parent Hispanic Non-Migrant No Member 9/3/2025 9/3/2026
Hilda Cencharles Community/Business Black Non-Migrant No Member 9/3/2025 9/3/2026
Yaima Lima Ramos Parent Others Non-Migrant No Member 9/3/2025 9/3/2026
GroupNumber%
Community/Business18.3
Non-instructional Staff18.3
Parent758.3
Principal18.3
Students (required for HS; optional for MS)00.0
Teachers216.7
The number of non-employees must be at least 51% of the total SAC membership.
NOTE: The Principal is included in the district employee count.
GroupNumberPercent
District Employee 541.7
Non-District Employee 758.3
SAC membership must be representative (within 15%) of the ethnic, racial and socio-economic community served by the school. NOTE: The principal is NOT included in the demographic composition breakdown.
EthnicityNumber% SAC% Students
 00.00.0
Black19.110.5
Hispanic545.548.8
Others19.19.1
White436.431.7
Date & TimeTitleLocationUploaded Files
Thursday, August 21, 2025 5:30 PMSAC_PTO Meeting #1CMS Media Center
Thursday, September 11, 2025 5:15 PMSAC/PTO Meeting #2CMS Media Center
Thursday, October 9, 2025 5:15 PMSAC/PTO Meeting #3CMS Media Center
Date

Existing Uploads