School Year
 Back to School List

Data Analysis - Needs Assessment

PatternELAMathScienceSocial Studies
What trends emerge across grade levels, subgroups, and core content areas?
K-2 overall proficiency increased at a higher rate as compared to the district average. EL subgroup showed gains in most grade levels. Advanced students underperformed in all grade levels.
1st and 4th grades overall proficiency and proficiency of subgroups increased at a higher rate as compared to the district.
Proficiency in subgroups decreased.
Which data component showed the most improvement? What new actions did your school take in this area?
Pleased with proficiency and gains in math. Focused on teacher knowledge of benchmarks during planning with support from district coordinator. Identified students had mentors to check in and motivate their success in school (Brilliant Bobcats).
Which data component showed the lowest performance? Explain the contributing factor(s) to last year's low performance and discuss any trends.
Lowest 25% in ELA and Math underperformed. Some contributing factors include shifts in ESE inclusion teacher as well as shifts in leadership, schedules, and classroom supports. Collaborative planning focused on building teacher knowledge of the rigor of the benchmarks.
Which data component showed the greatest decline from the prior year? Explain the factor(s) that contributed to this decline.
Science had the greatest decline from 74% to 70%. Teacher understanding of how to scaffold and enrich to the rigor of the benchmark. State assessment is now adaptive. Students struggling in reading have difficulty with science assessment.
Which data component had the greatest gap when compared to the state average? Explain the factor(s) that contributed to this gap and any trends. State data can be found here.
Lowest 25% in ELA and Math have significant gaps as compared to the state. Some contributing factors include shifts in ESE inclusion teacher as well as shifts in leadership, schedules, and classroom supports. Collaborative planning focused on building teacher knowledge of the rigor of the benchmarks.
Rank your highest priorities (maximum of 5) for school improvement in the upcoming school year.
Lowest 25% proficiency in ELA and Math SWD proficiency Building teacher knowledge of the benchmarks

SIP - Areas of Focus

Empowering every student through a supportive community, to strive for excellence in education.
To cultivate a nurturing and inclusive environment where every student is inspired, challenged, and equipped to achieve their full potential and excel academically, socially, and personally.
ELA proficiency will increase from 64% to 67% by May 31, 2026.
(View Marzano Model)
Helping students process new content- evidence(formative data) demonstrates students can summarize and generate conclusions about the new content during interactions with other students.
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
School-wide WIGs for ELA proficiency.
Person Responsible:
Brandon Carter, Principal
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
State and District Assessments. iReady usage (stretch growth)
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Weekly planning meeting with academic coaches and ELA instructional staff to review student data and plan benchmark aligned lessons/units. Weekly plans will include high yield instructional strategies for "how" instruction looks in ELA based on monthly professional learning and then needs of the students. SWIRL strategies will be intentionally planned for.
Person Responsible:
Michelle Spina, Literacy Coach/ Yani Griffin, EL Contact/ Elissa Burkard, ESE Program Specialist
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Collaborative discussions, lesson plans, and observations.
Action #3
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
ELA instructional staff will implement planned lessons, utilizing district resources and high yield strategies aligned to helping students process new content. Additional instructional strategies, including the integration of SWIRL strategies, will be evident in instruction, daily.
Person Responsible:
Michelle Spina, Literacy Coach
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Lesson plans, Observations, instructional rounds.
Action #4
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
During PLCs and academic action teams, staff will analyze student data, discuss barriers and trends, and share best practices.
Person Responsible:
ELA Instructional Staff/ Michelle Spina, Literacy Coach/ Yani Griffin, EL Contact/ Elissa Burkard, ESE Specialist
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
District and state assessments. Grade-level common assessments. Percentile Comparison Report.
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
Math proficiency will increase from 73% to 76% by May 31, 2026.
(View Marzano Model)
Helping students process new content- evidence(formative data) demonstrates students can summarize and generate conclusions about the new content during interactions with other students.
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
School-wide WIGs for math proficiency.
Person Responsible:
Administration
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
State and District Assessments. Aleks usage
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Weekly planning meeting with administration and math instructional staff to review student data and plan benchmark aligned lessons/units. Weekly plans will include high yield instructional strategies for "how" instruction looks in math based on monthly professional learning and then needs of the students. SWIRL strategies will be intentionally planned for.
Person Responsible:
Yani Griffin, EL Contact/ Elissa Burkard, ESE Specialist/ Administration
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Collaborative discussions, lesson plans, and observations.
Action #3
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Math instructional staff will implement planned lessons, utilizing district resources and high yield strategies aligned to helping students process new content. Additional instructional strategies, including the integration of SWIRL strategies, will be evident in instruction, daily.
Person Responsible:
Yani Griffin, EL Contact/ Elissa Burkard, ESE Specialist/ Administration
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Lesson plans, Observations, instructional rounds.
Action #4
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
During PLCs and academic action teams, staff will analyze student data, discuss barriers and trends, and share best practices.
Person Responsible:
Math instructional staff, Administration
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
District and state assessments. Grade-level common assessments.
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
L25% of students will go from 58% to 100% making a gain by May 31, 2026.
(View Marzano Model)
Helping students process new content- evidence(formative data) demonstrates students can summarize and generate conclusions about the new content during interactions with other students.
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
ELA support staff will implement planned lessons, utilizing district resources and high yield strategies aligned to helping students process new content.
Person Responsible:
Instructional staff
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Lesson plans, observations, discussion in planning.
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Establish MTSS protocols to identify students who need interventions. Identify instructional staff and materials for Tier 2 and Tier 3 support.
Person Responsible:
Tier 2 and Tier 3 Instructional Staff/ Michelle Spina, Literacy Coach/ Yani Griffin, EL Contact/ Elissa Burkard, ESE Specialist
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Data aligned with district resources.
Action #3
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Establish morning iReady club with identified students. Incentives for student participation.
Person Responsible:
Michelle Spina, Literacy Coach/ ESE Support Staff
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Literacy Coach and instructional staff monitor lessons passed and adjust paths as needed. Monitor progress on stretch growth.
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
No response.
(View Marzano Model)
No response.
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
No response.
(View Marzano Model)
No response.
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!
Student empowerment rating on the MRA will increase from 82 to 85 on the spring survey.
(View Marzano Model)
Establishing and Maintaining Effective Relationships in a Student-Centered Classroom
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Establish student lighthouse team.
Person Responsible:
Jory Lawson, School Counselor/ TBA Instructional Staff
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
MRA, BCE-created survey, attendance at lighthouse meetings.
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
100% of students have leadership roles in their classroom.
Person Responsible:
Instructional staff
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Displayed in rooms and around the school.
Action #3
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Student-led assemblies and school events.
Person Responsible:
Jory Lawson, School Counselor/ TBA Instructional Staff
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Planning and execution of the events by students.
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then click the Submit button to the right!

Schoolwide Program Plan (SWP) Requirements

This section must be completed if the school is implementing a Title I, Part A SWP and opts to use the SIP to satisfy the requirements of the SWP plan, as outlined in the ESSA, Public Law No. 114-95, § 1114(b). This section is not required for non-Title I schools.

Budget Document Uploads

No files uploaded
1.

Provide the methods for dissemination of this SIP, UniSIG budget and SWP to stakeholders (e.g., students, families, school staff and leadership and local businesses and organizations). Please articulate a plan or protocol for how this SIP and progress will be shared and disseminated and to the extent practicable, provided in a language a parent can understand. (ESSA 1114(b)(4))

List the school's webpage* where the SIP is made publicly available.
* A webpage is not sufficient as the sole method of dissemination.

No response.

2.

Describe how the school plans to build positive relationships with parents, families and other community stakeholders to fulfill the school’s mission, support the needs of students and keep parents informed of their child’s progress.

List the school's webpage* where the school's Family Engagement Plan is made publicly available. (ESSA 1116(b-g))
* A webpage is not sufficient as the sole method of dissemination.

No response.

3.

Describe how the school plans to strengthen the academic program in the school, increase the amount and quality of learning time and help provide an enriched and accelerated curriculum. Include the Area of Focus if addressed in Part II of the SIP. (ESSA 1114(b)(7)ii))

No response.

4.

If appropriate and applicable, describe how this plan is developed in coordination and integration with other Federal, State, and local services, resources and programs, such as programs supported under ESSA, violence prevention programs, nutrition programs, housing programs, Head Start programs, adult education programs, career and technical education programs, and schools implementing CSI or TSI activities under section 1111(d). (ESSA 1114(b)(5))

No response.

CSI, TSI and ATSI Resource Review

Describe the process to review school improvement funding allocations and ensure resources are allocated based on needs. This section must be completed if the school is identified as ATSI, TSI or CSI in addition to completing an Area(s) of Focus identifying interventions and activities within the SIP (ESSA 1111(d)(1)(B)(4) and (d)(2)(C).

No response.

Reading Achievement Initiative for Scholastic Excellence (RAISE)

For the 2025-2026 school year, the criteria includes schools with students in grades three through five where 50 percent or more of its students, in any grade level, score below a level 3 on the most recent statewide English Language Arts (ELA) assessment; or progress monitoring data collected from the coordinated screening and progress monitoring system pursuant to s. 1008.25(9), F.S., shows that 50 percent or more of the students are not on track to pass the statewide, standardized grade 3 ELA assessment for any grade level kindergarten through grade 3; and at least 10 students must be present for both the second and third full-time equivalent (FTE) survey periods and must be enrolled at the time of the statewide, standardized testing.

Include a description of your Area of Focus (Instructional Practice specifically relating to Reading/ELA) for each grade below, how it affects student learning in literacy, and a rationale that explains how it was identified as a critical need from the data reviewed. Data that should be used to determine the critical need should include, at a minimum:

  • The percentage of students below Level 3 on the 2024−2025 statewide, standardized ELA assessment. Identification criteria must include each grade that has 50 percent or more students scoring below Level 3 in grades 3-5 on the statewide, standardized ELA assessment.
  • The percentage of students in kindergarten through grade 3, based on 2024−2025 coordinated screening and progress monitoring system data, who are not on track to score Level 3 or above on the statewide, standardized ELA assessment.
  • Other forms of data that should be considered: formative, progress monitoring and diagnostic assessment data.
1.

Grades K-2: Instructional Practice specifically relating to Reading/ELA

No reponse.
2.

Grades 3-5: Instructional Practice specifically related to Reading/ELA

No reponse.

School Advisory Council (SAC)

NameGroupEthnicityMigrant StatusDistrict EmployeeRoleStart of TermEnd of Term
No Council member found!
GroupNumber%
Community/Business00.0
Non-instructional Staff00.0
Parent00.0
Principal00.0
Students (required for HS; optional for MS)00.0
Teachers00.0
The number of non-employees must be at least 51% of the total SAC membership.
NOTE: The Principal is included in the district employee count.
GroupNumberPercent
District Employee 00.0
Non-District Employee 00.0
SAC membership must be representative (within 15%) of the ethnic, racial and socio-economic community served by the school. NOTE: The principal is NOT included in the demographic composition breakdown.
EthnicityNumber% SAC% Students
 00.00.0
Black00.04.2
Hispanic00.043.6
Others00.08.9
White00.043.3
Date

Existing Uploads

No Bylaws files have been uploaded yet.