| What trends emerge across grade levels, subgroups, and core content areas? |
Learning gain trends in 9th and 10th decreased, ELL achievement and gain scores decreased. White and Hispanic subgroup population in learning gains and proficiency has decreased while black subgroup population has increased in learning gains and proficiency due to targeted PD.
ELA 9th grade overall L3 and higher proficiency: +6.5%
ELA 9th grade learning gains: -3%
ELA 9th grade lowest 25 achievement: -3%
ELA 9th grade ESE overall achievement: -15%
ELA 9th grade ESE learning gains: -3%
ELA 9th grade ELL achievement: -25%
ELA 9th grade ELL Gains: -5%
ELA 10th grade overall L3 and higher proficiency: -7.2%
ELA 10th grade learning gains: -6%
ELA 10th grade lowest 25 achievement: +18%
ELA 10th grade ESE overall achievement: +8%
ELA 10th grade ESE learning gains: +13%
ELA 10th grade ELL achievement: -18%
ELA 10th grade ELL Gains: -18%
|
Algebra overall L3 and higher proficiency: -6%
Algebra lowest 25 achievement: -26%
Algebra ESE achievement: -27%
Algebra ELL achievement: -12%
Algebra overall academic gains: -20%
Algebra ELL Gains: -12%
Geometry overall L3 and higher proficiency: +39%
Geometry lowest 25 achievement: -12%
Geometry ESE achievement: -11%
Geometry ELL achievement: -4%
Geometry overall academic gains= -8%
Geometry ELL Gains: -4%
|
Overall, -2% change in proficiency
2% decrease in ESE population
17% decrease in ESE
|
8% increase in overall proficiency
14% increase in ESE proficiency
35% increased in ELL proficiency
|
| What trends emerge across grade levels, subgroups, and core content areas? |
Most Improved Area
-9th Grade ELA overall achievement increased by 6.5%
-10th grade L25 and ESE data
Areas of Concern
FAST ELA Learning Gains 9-10 is -5%
Ongoing strategic planning within the PLC's and one all day semester release day will continue. Learning gain emphasis at the L4 & L5 showed dips in academic performance.
|
Most Improved Area
Geometry overall L3 and higher proficiency: +39%
Areas of Concern
Overall gain scores in Algebra.
Algebra Lowest 25 gains
|
ESE proficiency showed slow growth in Biology. A stronger remediation focus on Nature of Science and Life Science standards throughout the year will ensure inclusion teachers take a deeper dive into the standard expectations from Biology PLC's. A renewed focus toward our co-teacher pairings to overcome learning challenges, as well as, targeted scheduling that will allow for better individualized support for ESE students to hit their academic goals.
|
Positive increases for ELL and ESE students in US History.
|
| Which data component showed the most improvement? What new actions did your school take in this area? |
5% increase in US History Proficiency. Strategic with teacher placements. ESE Inclusion and ELL Tutors worked closely with US History teacher to meet student needs. Boot Camp for students to prepare for EOC. 9% increase in Acceleration Success. Student placement to ensure every student has the opportunity to receive an acceleration point. |
| Which data component showed the lowest performance? Explain the contributing factor(s) to last year's low performance and discuss any trends. |
21% decrease in Algebra I Proficiency. Loss of Math Coach and not using Aleks program with fidelity. Algebra I repeaters were not tested again. Learning Gains in Math and Learning Gains in Low 25% in Math.
17% decrease in ESE Biology proficiency. Difficult behaviors especially in classes after lunch. Working on student scheduling (students needing academic courses before or after lunch) |
| Which data component showed the greatest decline from the prior year? Explain the factor(s) that contributed to this decline. |
21% decrease in Algebra I Proficiency. Loss of Math Coach and not using Aleks program with fidelity. Algebra I repeaters were not tested again. |
| Which data component had the greatest gap when compared to the state average? Explain the factor(s) that contributed to this gap and any trends. State data can be found here. |
All academic reporting categories exhibited yields above state averages.
Geometry showed the greatest gap (+27% higher) compared to the state average.
Ongoing monitoring of knowledge checks, differentiated assignments, and quarterly progress checks |
| Rank your highest priorities (maximum of 5) for school improvement in the upcoming school year. |
BCHS Priorities
1) Focus on ELA, Math, and Biology overall student proficiency and learning gain increases (i.e., deeper dive into the standards, vetting formative assessments to track progress)
2) Lowest 25 subgroup data in Math and ELA. Increase academic gains through targeted instructional support, remediation efforts, and PBIS incentives (i.e., rewards, treats from Mrs. Gersbach in attendance/discipline)
3) Reduce proficiency gaps among all ESE students grades 9-10 against their peers. Strengthen consistent inclusion teacher support in the classroom and progress monitor their effectiveness quarterly with all students on their caseloads monthly with admin. Identify any areas where inclusion teachers may benefit from additional professional development, District resources, and content-area growth in the standards(i.e., attend grade-level PLC's)
4) Graduation rate
5) Continue to improve BCHS school culture through the implementation of Thank you Thursday initiatives, teachers incentives, inspirational professional developments to foster a growth mindset, teacher input/communication, and clear goal-setting expectations. |