School Year

Data Analysis - Needs Assessment

PatternELAMathScienceSocial Studies
What trends emerge across grade levels, subgroups, and core content areas?
Outperformed district in overall proficiency in all grade levels, including SWD. Underperformed slightly in 8th grade with LY/LF students.
Underperformed district in 8th grade proficiency. LY/LF population outperformed district. 8th grade SWD underperformed while showing improvement. Over 80% of students demonstrated gains.
Large disparity in proficiency between non-LY/LF students in the two classes. Veteran teacher was 92% proficient vs. newer teacher at 34%.
Gains across the board from FY23 to FY24. Adjustment of ELL students was beneficial and showed need for more support.
Which data component showed the most improvement? What new actions did your school take in this area?
7th grade >3 made most ELA improvement - Newer https://data.collierschools.com/SchImprovement/PlanningForImprovement.aspx#tabStep2science teacher will meet with district TSA weekly for content planning. Teacher will also observe a colleague for best practices on classroom management.
Which data component showed the lowest performance? Explain the contributing factor(s) to last year's low performance and discuss any trends.
8th Science, specifically the non LY/LF population. Contributing factor was a non-collaborative planning and a need for improved classroom management. 8th grade math SWD also underperformed.
Which data component showed the greatest decline from the prior year? Explain the factor(s) that contributed to this decline.
8th grade math showed a decline - but still showed improvement by student. Additional direction from certified math teacher for the foundations course will correct this in FY25
Which data component had the greatest gap when compared to the state average? Explain the factor(s) that contributed to this gap and any trends. State data can be found here.
8th grade math -14 from state. SWD population was greatest factor.
Rank your highest priorities (maximum of 5) for school improvement in the upcoming school year.
8th grade math 8th grade science instruction ELL - use of tutor

SIP - Areas of Focus

All students will complete school prepared for ongoing learning as well as community and global responsibilities. P: Prepare R: Responsible M: Motivated S: Safe
Our mission is to deliver an excellent education, prepare students for future challenges and opportunities, and empower all learners to achieve and succeed.
Based on SY24 data, ELA gains will increase overall reading proficiency from 64% to 67% as evidenced by SY25 state test scores by May 31, 2025.
(View Marzano Model)
Using Questions to Help Students Elaborate on Content & Helping Students Engage in Cognitively Complex Tasks
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Plan for and conduct bi-weekly structured professional learning activities which focus on Helping Students Elaborate on Content & Helping Students Engage in Cognitively Complex Tasks.
Person Responsible:
Jane Higgins, literacy coach
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Monitoring of Collaborative Planning and lesson plans to ensure strategies planned for align to Helping Students Process New Content Common planning lesson plans along with Data Chat forms.
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
During PLCs, the team will analyze student data and share best practices.
Person Responsible:
Jane Higgins, Literacy Coach
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Mid-unit and end of unit data, student writing samples, and common lesson plans
Action #3
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Plan for and conduct monthly structured professional learning activities which focus on Helping Students Elaborate on Content and Helping Students Engage in Cognitively Complex Tasks..
Person Responsible:
Jane Higgins, Literacy Coach
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Staff will be monitored for their engagement and comprehension of strategies during the interactive professional learning sessions.
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then clich the Submit button to the right!
Based on SY24 data, Math gains will increase overall math proficiency from 82% to 85% as evidenced by SY25 state test scores by May 31, 2025.
(View Marzano Model)
Using Questions to Help Students Elaborate on Content & Helping Students Engage in Cognitively Complex Tasks
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Plan for and conduct bi-weekly structured professional learning activities which focus on Helping Students Elaborate on Content & Helping Students Engage in Cognitively Complex Tasks.
Person Responsible:
Lisa Hicks, Math POC and Jackie Burwell-Tibero, Department Chair
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Monitoring of Collaborative Planning and lesson plans to ensure strategies planned for align to Helping Students Process New Content Common planning lesson plans along with Data Chat forms.
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
During PLCs, the team will analyze student data and share best practices.
Person Responsible:
Lisa Hicks, Math POC and Jackie Burwell-Tibero, Department Chair
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Mid-unit and end of unit data, student work samples, and common lesson plans
Action #3
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Plan for and conduct monthly structured professional learning activities which focus on Helping Students Elaborate on Content & Helping Students Engage in Cognitively Complex Tasks..
Person Responsible:
Lisa Hicks, Math POC and Jackie Burwell-Tibero, Department Chair
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Staff will be monitored for their engagement and comprehension of strategies during the interactive professional learning sessions.
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then clich the Submit button to the right!
Based on SY24 data, students will increase overall civics proficiency from 85% to 88% as evidenced by SY25 state test scores by May 31, 2025.
(View Marzano Model)
Using Questions to Help Students Elaborate on Content & Helping Students Engage in Cognitively Complex Tasks
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Plan for and conduct bi-weekly structured professional learning activities which focus on Helping Students Elaborate on Content & Helping Students Engage in Cognitively Complex Tasks.
Person Responsible:
Darah Perini, Department Chair
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Monitoring of Collaborative Planning and lesson plans to ensure strategies planned for align to Helping Students Process New Content Common planning lesson plans along with Data Chat forms.
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
During PLCs, the team will analyze student data and share best practices.
Person Responsible:
Darah Perini, Department Chair
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Mid-unit and end of unit data, student work samples, and common lesson plans
Action #3
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Plan for and conduct monthly structured professional learning activities which focus on Helping Students Elaborate on Content & Helping Students Engage in Cognitively Complex Tasks..
Person Responsible:
Darah Perini, Department Chair
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Staff will be monitored for their engagement and comprehension of strategies during the interactive professional learning sessions.
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then clich the Submit button to the right!
Based on SY24 data, students will increase overall science proficiency from 61% to 64% as evidenced by SY25 state test scores by May 31, 2025.
(View Marzano Model)
Using Questions to Help Students Elaborate on Content & Helping Students Engage in Cognitively Complex Tasks
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Plan for and conduct bi-weekly structured professional learning activities which focus on Helping Students Elaborate on Content & Helping Students Engage in Cognitively Complex Tasks.
Person Responsible:
Beth Sydney, Department Chair
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Monitoring of Collaborative Planning and lesson plans to ensure strategies planned for align to Helping Students Process New Content Common planning lesson plans along with Data Chat forms.
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
During PLCs, the team will analyze student data and share best practices.
Person Responsible:
Beth Sydney, Department Chair
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Mid-unit and end of unit data, student work samples, and common lesson plans
Action #3
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Plan for and conduct monthly structured professional learning activities which focus on Helping Students Elaborate on Content & Helping Students Engage in Cognitively Complex Tasks..
Person Responsible:
Beth Sydney, Department Chair
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Staff will be monitored for their engagement and comprehension of strategies during the interactive professional learning sessions.
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then clich the Submit button to the right!
No response.
(View Marzano Model)
No response.
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then clich the Submit button to the right!
Staff participation for all extra curricular events will increase by 50% by May 2025. The number of staff celebrations of Panther Points of Pride will increase by 50% from FY24 by May 2025.
(View Marzano Model)
Promoting Teacher Leadership & Collaboration
Action #1
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Updating all staff calendars will PRM event information with quarterly rewards for staff members in attendance
Person Responsible:
Nicole Bills and Michelle Gordon, Principal
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Staff attending events will check in with administrator attending event.
Action #2
Action Steps to implement evidence-based strategy:
Weekly email to all staff with a reminder to celebrate their colleagues for Panther Points of Pride
Person Responsible:
Michelle Gordon, Principal
Progress Monitoring Evidence:
Administration will email out in the weekly staff email all Panther Point of Pride.
Budget
Funding SourceFunctionObjectProjectBudget NarrativeFTEAmount
No data to display, enter information below then clich the Submit button to the right!

Schoolwide Program Plan (SWP) Requirements

This section must be completed if the school is implementing a Title I, Part A SWP and opts to use the SIP to satisfy the requirements of the SWP plan, as outlined in the ESSA, Public Law No. 114-95, § 1114(b). This section is not required for non-Title I schools.

Budget Document Uploads

No files uploaded
1.

Provide the methods for dissemination of this SIP, UniSIG budget and SWP to stakeholders (e.g., students, families, school staff and leadership and local businesses and organizations). Please articulate a plan or protocol for how this SIP and progress will be shared and disseminated and to the extent practicable, provided in a language a parent can understand. (ESSA 1114(b)(4))

List the school's webpage* where the SIP is made publicly available.
* A webpage is not sufficient as the sole method of dissemination.

No response.

2.

Describe how the school plans to build positive relationships with parents, families and other community stakeholders to fulfill the school’s mission, support the needs of students and keep parents informed of their child’s progress.

List the school's webpage* where the school's Family Engagement Plan is made publicly available. (ESSA 1116(b-g))
* A webpage is not sufficient as the sole method of dissemination.

No response.

3.

Describe how the school plans to strengthen the academic program in the school, increase the amount and quality of learning time and help provide an enriched and accelerated curriculum. Include the Area of Focus if addressed in Part II of the SIP. (ESSA 1114(b)(7)ii))

No response.

4.

If appropriate and applicable, describe how this plan is developed in coordination and integration with other Federal, State, and local services, resources and programs, such as programs supported under ESSA, violence prevention programs, nutrition programs, housing programs, Head Start programs, adult education programs, career and technical education programs, and schools implementing CSI or TSI activities under section 1111(d). (ESSA 1114(b)(5))

No response.

CSI, TSI and ATSI Resource Review

Describe the process to review school improvement funding allocations and ensure resources are allocated based on needs. This section must be completed if the school is identified as ATSI, TSI or CSI in addition to completing an Area(s) of Focus identifying interventions and activities within the SIP (ESSA 1111(d)(1)(B)(4) and (d)(2)(C).

No response.

Reading Achievement Initiative for Scholastic Excellence (RAISE)

For the 2024-2025 school year, the criteria includes schools with students in grades three through five where 50 percent or more of its students, in any grade level, score below a level 3 on the most recent statewide English Language Arts (ELA) assessment; or progress monitoring data collected from the coordinated screening and progress monitoring system pursuant to s. 1008.25(9), F.S., shows that 50 percent or more of the students are not on track to pass the statewide, standardized grade 3 ELA assessment for any grade level kindergarten through grade 3; and at least 10 students must be present for both the second and third full-time equivalent (FTE) survey periods and must be enrolled at the time of the statewide, standardized testing.

Include a description of your Area of Focus (Instructional Practice specifically relating to Reading/ELA) for each grade below, how it affects student learning in literacy, and a rationale that explains how it was identified as a critical need from the data reviewed. Data that should be used to determine the critical need should include, at a minimum:

  • The percentage of students below Level 3 on the 2023−2024 statewide, standardized ELA assessment. Identification criteria must include each grade that has 50 percent or more students scoring below Level 3 in grades 3-5 on the statewide, standardized ELA assessment.
  • The percentage of students in kindergarten through grade 3, based on 2023−2024 coordinated screening and progress monitoring system data, who are not on track to score Level 3 or above on the statewide, standardized ELA assessment.
  • Other forms of data that should be considered: formative, progress monitoring and diagnostic assessment data.
1.

Grades K-2: Instructional Practice specifically relating to Reading/ELA

No reponse.
2.

Grades 3-5: Instructional Practice specifically related to Reading/ELA

No reponse.